Point Lobos Hat Pattern

Sarah-Hope is still at Stitches West, but asked me (this is Melissa writing…) to post the pattern that she is sharing at the convention. It’s called the Point Lobos Hat. Click here to download a pdf file of the pattern. Personally, I refer to it as the Venus of Willendorf Hat, but whatever it’s called, it’s very cool.

Postcard front, Point Lobos Hat

February 24 2007 02:43 pm | Patterns and Point Lobos Hat

8 Responses to “Point Lobos Hat Pattern”

  1. lella on 26 Feb 2007 at 12:31 pm #

    Thank you! I love your hats, and keep up the great work!

  2. kate on 28 Feb 2007 at 2:24 pm #

    This a is a great hat! I’ll definitely keep checking back for more of your great designs.

  3. whatifknits » Santa Cruz Hat and a Gallery Invitation on 12 Oct 2007 at 9:43 am #

    [...] patterns available free on-line (and more will be coming soon): Basic Wrist Warmers Bulky Tam Point Lobos Hat Reversible SWS Hat Sandia Hat Santa Cruz Hat Splint Covers Stripes and Strands Hat Tamalpais Hats [...]

  4. Mary on 05 Nov 2008 at 10:27 am #

    A question re: Point lobos eyelet ridge hat: Should the decrease (round 3) be on a pearl round?
    Thanks.
    Mary

  5. sarah-hope on 05 Nov 2008 at 6:06 pm #

    No, Mary–

    I wrote the pattern so there are no decreases on the purl rounds, only on knit rounds.

  6. emma on 07 Jan 2009 at 7:28 am #

    jan 7 2009 i was looking at your site and found a nice hat pattern point lobo hat but i cant seen to be able to print it out

  7. Wendi on 27 Jan 2009 at 10:59 am #

    I have the same question as Mary re: point lobos hat. I was doing fine until the decrease rounds and now everything looks wrong. It seems like a purl round (round 3)is missing in each set and the ridges don’t look right. Any idea what I might be doing wrong? And how do I get the same ridge look without round 3 being purled? Thanks, Wendi

  8. sarah-hope on 27 Jan 2009 at 12:06 pm #

    Wendi and Mary, You’re right, there’s an error in the pattern. When you hit the decreases, rounds 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7 should be worked as in the original. Rounds 4, 6, and 8 should have the decreases. My apologies!

Trackback URI | Comments RSS

Leave a Reply